| | |
|  | FCP X - steady as she goes.by Bill Davis 1 week agoI really have nothing important to say here. Since I've posted a couple of OT threads contributing nothing about how X actually functions... I'll spend today (Sunday) doing 20 pages of narration work +3  | Re: FCP X - steady as she goes.
by Michael Gissing 6 days ago
Bill Davis "No reason to change perfection!" I love your consistency Bill. Always the champion of the Apple new. Even when it sometimes takes a step backwards, you see the positive. But sometimes you
+2 |
| |
| | |
| | |
|  | Voice overs in 14 with Fairlight?by Kevin Duffey 1 week agoHey all, I am probably missing something obvious, but what is the best way to be able to visually watch the video while recording voice overs using Fairlight I seem to go to Fairlight tab and cant see | Re: Voice overs in 14 with Fairlight?
by Michael Gissing 1 week ago
The Fairlight page is part of beta software. Fairlight is a newish purchase for BM (almost one year) and it is amazing that they have managed to get so much functionality into the beta software. As a
+1 |
| |
| | |
| | |
|  | Fusion 9 leak, VR and price dropby Andrew Kimery 3 weeks agoPost Magazine apparently ran a story about Fusion 9 too soon. It gets a new, comprehensive VR toolset (I know how much everyone here loves VR) and a price drop to $299 to match Resolve. Page is gone n+1 | Re: Fusion 9 leak, VR and price drop
by Michael Gissing 3 weeks ago
Spot on Tim. It's amazing how a company grants (see what I did there) a wish to so many of us with an amazing upgrade to Resolve and Fusion and the first thing people jump to is why don't BM make a st
+1 |
| |
| | |
| | |
|  | What would really make you excited ...by Simon Ubsdell 2 months ago... about the next version of FCP X Whether you're a diehard FCP X aficionado or someone who's still sitting on the fence, what would be the feature, or set of features, that would really set your wor | |
| | |
| | |
|  | FCP minus the Xby James Culbertson 2 months agoI'm thinking it is time to start calling FCPX... FCP. We could call FCP legacy... FCPL. Thoughts | Re: FCP minus the X
by Michael Gissing 2 months ago
Language is best when it doesn't cloud meaning. When someone says FCP it automatically requires clarification between two very distinct software packages. To what purpose does it advance communication
+1 |
| |
| | |
| | |
|  | FCPX Documentary on Kickstarter!by Noah Kadner 2 months agoFor those want to see the FCPX debate taken to a whole other level please check out Off the Tracks on Kickstarter: http: kck.st 2uiKYZH Kickstarter Pitch Video https: www.youtube.com watch v=F9dtsd2ZV | |
| | |
| | |
|  | Autodesk subscription modelby Oliver Peters 3 months agoWe debate subscriptions often here. This is an interesting article as it pertains to subscription at Autodesk. The last part about pirates is enlightening. http: www.studiodaily.com 2017 05 autodesk-r+1 | |
| | |
| | |
|  | iMac Proby Steve Connor 3 months agoAnyone else watching the WWDC keynote I'm definitely getting an iMac Pro!+1 | Re: iMac Pro
by Michael Gissing 3 months ago
Depends how you upgrade. For me it means swapping out Mobo, CPU, graphics card(s) and often RAM. When you already own monitors, rack cases, power supplies, water coolers (not always reusable), an upgr
+1 |
| |
| | |
| | |
|  | XML Relink to Red Source Filesby Niclas Werres 3 months agoHello Everybody, I'm fairly new to DaVinci and have a problem regarding our Premiere Project, which was edited with Premiere Pro. Since we were shooting in 6K R3D Footage, we rendered out proxies. In | Re: XML Relink to Red Source Files
by Michael Gissing 3 months ago
Two important steps when relinking to original media. Firstly make sure only the r3d files are on the drive you are pointing to, not the proxies as well. When importing the xml you have the option che
+1 |
| |
| | |
